🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate atomic discussions with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Path

Araghchi is treading a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The US president recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He said the assaults commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly sought to impose their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and stays the final answer to resolve disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more united, and more backing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."