🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct response by the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in local state media, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and financial stability.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal actions, including confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the new legal action. The institution has previously noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that such holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that if you do all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."